Caleb, you complain

Caleb, you complain that the Cairo message was Subversively un-American, as it essentially conceded the mob's anger at the film's existence as julbifiatseTo which I say, well, no.The mob's anger at the film's existence IS justifiable, and, in fact, is justified. The film-maker did something to intentionally insult people of a specific religious group. When Person A does something to intentionally insult Person B, Person B is fully justified in being angry at Person A.What is not justified at all is taking that anger at Person A out on Persons C, D, and E, who had nothing to do with it.

Recipe by   
 W4iPMuTRc Servings
  • Prep
    7dEnevKECc mins
  • Cook
    a0rh9X1AFq4 mins
  • Serve in
    7 mins

Ingredients

  •   g7IqktWy /   m5M5htIZMGQw

Instructions

Step 1

Caleb, you complain that the Cairo message was "Subversively un-American, as it essentially conceded the mob's anger at the film's existence as julbifiatse"To which I say, well, "no".The mob's anger at the film's existence IS justifiable, and, in fact, is justified. The film-maker did something to intentionally insult people of a specific religious group. When Person A does something to intentionally insult Person B, Person B is fully justified in being angry at Person A.What is not justified at all is taking that anger at Person A out on Persons C, D, and E, who had nothing to do with it. / Caleb, you complain that the Cairo message was "Subversively un-American, as it essentially conceded the mob's anger at the film's existence as julbifiatse"To which I say, well, "no".The mob's anger at the film's existence IS justifiable, and, in fact, is justified. The film-maker did something to intentionally insult people of a specific religious group. When Person A does something to intentionally insult Person B, Person B is fully justified in being angry at Person A.What is not justified at all is taking that anger at Person A out on Persons C, D, and E, who had nothing to do with it.